I kinda doubt there are any post restrictions, seeing as the roles are taken from Xylbot.
Filipk:TWS do you find anything surprising about the role I made up in my previous post. If you could swap your role for the role I made up would you? How about if everybody knew you swapped for that role?
Yeah, it looks like an SK fakeclaim. Why is that? The other questions involve subtle rolefishing, so I won't answer them.
Reyn:TheWetSheep:If You were Vigilante, WHo would Ye be after first
Hector because he's scum.
Hector:TWS
I asked him why he focused on what he saw as a non-sequitur as opposed to you asking questions to only three of the players, TDS asking questions of no-one and throwing a vote back at you for voting him, and FoU asking hypothetical questions. Of all the things that had happened at that point, content was unlikely to be generated by asking someone about their speculation on a post-restriction.
Seems a little weak, don't you think? I mean, this is less than a page into RVS. And if those things you mentioned were as question-worthy as you say they are, why did you yourself only talk about the post restriction?
I found something else to pick up on at the time. I have since pressured FoU regarding those questions, and TDS has posted some of his own. You haven't followed up on your initial questions, why not?
Some of them haven't been answered, others aren't helpful. RVS questions don't have much inherent value, I'm totally fine with letting them go.
Also, how does it not matter what I was talking about? I'm going to jump on people for the way they try to generate content irrespective of who they're doing it to. I misinterpreted what was happening, aye, but that doesn't change the fact not much content is going to be generated by asking someone about their speculation another player has an amusing post-restriction, is it?
I wasn't challenging the validity of your argument, I was saying that it's suspicious that you focused so much on critiquing TBF's questions to you. Also, if you care so much about proper content-generation, why haven't you challenged any one else on it?
Demonstrably false. I challenged UXLZ on their "choose three people at random" question, and FoU's hypotheticals.[/quote]Sorry, I meant to say, 'why
hadn't you challenged anyone else on it'. Those examples came after my vote on you.
Anyway, most of the folk who had posted had actually asked questions at that point, most of which had something to do with the game or some facet thereof.
TBF asked me about a throw-away comment, that would not generate content.
It's funny because your posts were equally content-less at that point.
You seem to be in the word-twisting business, though whether that's to draw a reaction from the questionee or something more nefarious... too early to tell.
Are you trying to accuse me without actually starting an argument here or what?
Thinking out loud, and bringing it to the attention of others. Since you brought it up, though, perhaps you'd like to comment. How will twisting someone's words help you find scum?
I'm not sure I agree that asking you an agressively worded question is word-twisting - I'm giving you the opportunity to respond, after all. But either way, you said it yourself in the bold there.
Weirdo, Imic: You guys are kind of in the deep end here, but please try to contribute some. It's not really okay to just sit back and watch a game that you signed up to play in.
Author
Topic: Power Hungry Mafia - D3 - Game over, town and survivor win! (Read 61442 times)