First pass was a bust. I thought
Max's vote of Knightwing here was garbage because he (in my mind) had just defended Tric's non-participation. Upon further review, he specifically defended Tric the player as is, and not his content. Past that he's been playing okay; well enough I guess? Still think his "Miller" claim was a bit sus and late. I am left with a question, though.
Maximum Spin: Who's your pick after Fallacy? Why?
I'm not liking Juicebox, based on two posts.
Quick Pfp
I meant that as in there hasn't been any follow up on it so far. Also what do you mean you're out of vote changes?
I don't like changing my vote a lot. If I don't have someone in mind to change it to, I tend to leave it in one place. So I was just kind of making a joke referencing that.
I didn't really think I needed to follow up. I still think Fallacy's suspicious - Jim actually just did a great job explaining why - but so do several other people, there's a lot of game left, I didn't think I needed to press the issue? This might be part of what ToonyMan means by saying I play selfishly. I just sort of think it is not my job to get this guy in particular voted out. You can even see the clear difference, if you look up webadict's Supernatural, when it was in fact literally my job to get one guy in particular voted out.
Maximum Spin - no complaints, much like notquitethere; His statement about trying to be more helpful did make me raise my eyebrow a little because I remember EuchreJack's comment from AutoMafia where he said if Max is trying to be helpful then he's scum and if he's trying to be aloof then he's town.
I like most everything in this readslist, but I just want to reassure you that EuchreJack isn't the god of my meta.
The eight posts starting from here:
I don't like this disengaged Knightwing, I don't feel good about this fake-looking Jack Panic, and I'm not a fan of this interaction, especially from two people I would most expect to interact like this as scum.
Wow, I guess that's everything. I thought there was going to be more. Maybe in my first readthrough I had more to say that I cared about less this time around.
My first instinct is to vote Knightwing. This isn't related to Lenglon doing so, I've been thinking about it since last night; but the reasoning is the same. This Knightwing seems, once again, to be faking playing the game. I also 100% believe he would submit mafia as his role preference, for what that's worth.
I like this post from Max, it's enough for me to unvote for now
I don't find Max's post near strong enough for Juice to back off a vote here.
Second, this too long to quote post about how he likes one of Knightwing's posts that I find barely adequate. Maybe we just are really looking for different things in a post, but... yeah, that's how I want to say it. Juicebox lacks commitment. In this same post, he votes me...
Oh and before I forget, Tricmagic
But backs off it without mentioning anything else about me. Overall, his content feels phoned in and inconsistent, with poor reasons for inconsistency. I'm not QUITE sure enough to throw down a vote, but it's just weird and I don't like it.
Juicebox: Why, exactly, was the above linked post from Knightwing so good?
Someone else did that too; they posted a vote and then quickly backed off it for no real good reason, but I'll be damned if I can find it now.
I'm not sure I trust Fallacy. His
opening gambit was good, and he's posting enough and presenting analysis. Mmmmm I feel like he's more interested in getting a lynch in than actually convinced Fallacy is scum? In his gambit conclusion post:
So, crazy theory. I think the scumteam could realistically be TricMagic, Jim Groovester, and then one or both of hector13/notquitethere, depending on how the setup works out. If there's a bunch of third parties it'd be just one of them, if not it's both.
Jim and notquitethere's behavior seems to match the idea of 'distance the guy that'll drag us down like an anchor if we don't'. Reluctant to target him, but acknowledging that he's funky as hell. Hector is less suspicious, but still a possibility.
If this theory does hold water I'd scum-percentage these people as 100% scum (required) TricMagic, 85% scum Jim, 65% notquitethere, 40% scum hector.
The thing is though?
This makes TricMagic an ideal execution / vote. Based on this connection, it'll be extremely informative about the scumminess or lack thereof of a good few people. Nearly everyone has thoughts on Tric. We don't lose anything from the vote since the most likely outcomes are he's either third party or scum - most of us don't think he's town.
It's, in other words, a safe, effective execution - perfect for Day 1.
I'm willing to sustain this vote for the remainder of the day unless a better target presents themselves.
I feel like he's conflating Tric's guilt and the informative value of Tric's lynch together. You'll note a lack of conclusions drawn from a Tric flip of anything but red. (Until Lenglon calls him out on this same point.)
Okay, yeah.
FallacyofUrist: What happens to your analysis and plan when I
Unvote TricMagic for actually participating now?