Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[webadict]

What about it is suspicious? I too can quote things, but it takes a real analysis to make it mean a thing.

You're voting him.

Explain why fully.

You're voting for me because you lack the ability to look back and find out why I was voting fr him, despite the fact that you can go back and find the post where I vote for him?

Also, you can quote things and they don't count as three words, huh?

Three words:

What a hypocrite.

[SHAD0Wdump]

What about it is suspicious? I too can quote things, but it takes a real analysis to make it mean a thing.

You're voting him.

Explain why fully.

You're voting for me because you lack the ability to look back and find out why I was voting fr him, despite the fact that you can go back and find the post where I vote for him?

Also, you can quote things and they don't count as three words, huh?

Three words:

What a hypocrite.

Explain again dork.

[webadict]

What about it is suspicious? I too can quote things, but it takes a real analysis to make it mean a thing.

You're voting him.

Explain why fully.

You're voting for me because you lack the ability to look back and find out why I was voting fr him, despite the fact that you can go back and find the post where I vote for him?

Also, you can quote things and they don't count as three words, huh?

Three words:

What a hypocrite.

Explain again dork.

Go back and look. The only thing you can apparently do is say three words, so you have the capacity and the time to look.

So, maybe instead of being lazy, making up excuses, and providing no help, you could...

Oh, what's it called...

Hold on...

Tip of my tongue...

Oh right. Shoot yourself in the head.

Just leave.

[SHAD0Wdump]

What about it is suspicious? I too can quote things, but it takes a real analysis to make it mean a thing.

You're voting him.

Explain why fully.

You're voting for me because you lack the ability to look back and find out why I was voting fr him, despite the fact that you can go back and find the post where I vote for him?

Also, you can quote things and they don't count as three words, huh?

Three words:

What a hypocrite.

Explain again dork.

Go back and look. The only thing you can apparently do is say three words, so you have the capacity and the time to look.

So, maybe instead of being lazy, making up excuses, and providing no help, you could...

Oh, what's it called...

Hold on...

Tip of my tongue...

Oh right. Shoot yourself in the head.

Just leave.

Afraid to talk?

[Rashilul]

Geez, this is taking too long. (Unvote)Dakarian do one of your lists and let's pick out the scummiest.

Pre-post edit: Webadict, your hostility to all things town is quite suspicious. Make you should take a tranquilizer and come back.
Besides that you're being downright annoying.

[Rashilul]

Maybe you should take a tranquilizer and come back.

[Mr.Person]

Apparently I gained a second vote and started voting Dakarian. I don't remember doing this, so it must be an error in the vote count. I'll hold my Zai vote, he's very scummy, but Neruz's bandwagoning statement is simply unacceptable.

Webadict, refusing to rexplain yourself is scummy. Reexplain yourself or I'll vote you.

[Mephansteras]

I'm leaving my vote on Neruz. Calling for a Bandwagon on the person with the most votes? Yeah, still scummy.

[Org]

I'm leaving my vote on Neruz. Calling for a Bandwagon on the person with the most votes? Yeah, still scummy.

Agreed. *Glares at Zai

[dakarian]

Zai, you do little to explain yourself: just plop down some accusations:

On your "most scummy list"
Me?  I'm ...off.. why who knows..
Meph: No force or drive.. when you aren't voting for him, questioning, him, or even using an argument that's not being used by someone else
Neurez: more valid, though it seems not that strong since you quickly left him for Meph...

..who you quickly unvoted once you liked his reasoning and got poked at by Mr. Person (and thus went to a 'safe spot' by voting for the lurker and declaring everyone should do similar)

..then quickly went BACK to voting for throwing a question out

..then unvoted and switched with Web with a "it's Web and/or Meph" with no explanation why either HAS to be scum and why Web looks worse than him since you didn't pressure either one of them.

OHBTW, if we go BACK to that post you have a nice bit with Mr.Person where he attacks you and, in response, you declare him 'no longer suspicious'.

As for Web.. he pushes you and, what do we get:  this. 

You're voting for him.. that is, you are of a mind to have him Killed.. and you don't care to explain why you want to or have any need to convince anyone for it.

Instead you point at me and say "go get em."


Meanwhile, you threaten me with saying I'm one of your prime suspects then pull off to consider me "perhaps scum if one of these guys aren't scum", then charge at the person I'm attacking.

I know that game.  The story is meant to end with this:

Dakarian, feeling the threat of death fade away from him, charges with renewed vigor at his accuser.  With the combined effort, they strike hard against the Webadict and smite him.  Others join the battle cry and soon the noose is on his neck and the "Aggressive Jerk" is finally out of our hairs forever! I'm sorry, but I've seen that game before.  Pandarsenic hit the town HARD with that in BM2.  It's the Lightning Rod strategy.  Look for a person who attacks accusers, push them a little, then spring them at another and watch them slaughter that person. 

You're casual, not aggressive.  You're passive, not careful.  You're "Me Too" ish, not supportive.  You don't argue, you don't debate, you just want attack the worst hit so you don't LOOK like you're bandwagoning. 

You're scum.  I don't even know why I'm waiting.  It'll take someone else to show me why I'm mistaken.

@Everyone
Please read over Zai's section of the Wide Scan (though please excuse the 'passive' mislinks that lead to Rash's posts instead), then read my arguments and Zai's posts throughout the day and answer me this:

1. If there's something I'm missing PLEASE tell me so I can explain or reevaluate my argument.

2. If I make sense but you are just suspicious please send questions or accusations to Zai so he can explain his side of the matter.

3. If what I say make sense and you see no defense for him then Vote him and let's end this day.


For myself, I want to either understand fully why Zai may not be scum or see him lynched.

[Apostolic Nihilist]

I apologize for not posting more. As the number of pages grow, it becomes more of a committment to actually find the time to read through everything, so I ended up putting it off for a bit. I have more time now though; I'm going to go through and try a "wide-scan".
I just read through once, and the only thing that stuck out was web's ridiculous level of hostility in his posts but not necessarily in his votes.

[webadict]

What about it is suspicious? I too can quote things, but it takes a real analysis to make it mean a thing.

You're voting him.

Explain why fully.

You're voting for me because you lack the ability to look back and find out why I was voting fr him, despite the fact that you can go back and find the post where I vote for him?

Also, you can quote things and they don't count as three words, huh?

Three words:

What a hypocrite.

Explain again dork.

Go back and look. The only thing you can apparently do is say three words, so you have the capacity and the time to look.

So, maybe instead of being lazy, making up excuses, and providing no help, you could...

Oh, what's it called...

Hold on...

Tip of my tongue...

Oh right. Shoot yourself in the head.

Just leave.

Afraid to talk?

ARE YOU SERIOUS?

Apparently I gained a second vote and started voting Dakarian. I don't remember doing this, so it must be an error in the vote count. I'll hold my Zai vote, he's very scummy, but Neruz's bandwagoning statement is simply unacceptable.

Webadict, refusing to rexplain yourself is scummy. Reexplain yourself or I'll vote you.

GO
LOOK
FOR
YOURSELVES
I
AM
NOT
YOUR
MAID
YOU
HAVE
HANDS
OH
MY
GOD
GO
DIE!
TRY
LOOKING
BACK
A
FEW
PAGES
IS
THAT
SO
HARD
OR
DO
YOU
HAVE
NO
INTELLIGENCE

Just because you're a simpleton and severely mentally impaired doesn't mean you can't click back a FEW PAGES. And if it does, I'm surprised you made it to this page to begin with, let alone are capable of understanding me or anyone else and how on earth are you managing to form complete words?

Of course, no one will call you out on it, because you can only speak three words. Wanna know what? I'm going to make sure you die, one way or another.

And Mr.Person... you disgust me. I'm pretty sure you were present when I was GIVING the reasons why dakarian was scummy, and here you are pointing out that, in fact, I have not. Ask dakarian. He knows I've given reasons, and HE'S THE ONE I'M VOTING.

So, until you start participating (I don't care if he can only speak 3 words, he's not doing anything!), I'll unvote dakarian and vote SHAD0Wdump.

I don't care if it's an OMGUS. You're not giving any reasons for voting me, or at least any valid reasons, because the one you provided is clearly false. I don't care if you have a posting restriction, because you can still contribute otherwise, instead of by doing nothing. Heck, I don't even care if everyone thinks that your posting is okay.

Because your posting restriction is a load of crap.

Yeah, that's right. It's not real. You can post as much as you want. Yet you refuse to, because helping the town is contradictory to your nature. So, start posting. Tell everyone why you're refusing to help them. I know your restriction is fake, just like I know I gave real reasons, and like I know you can contribute, and like I know that you

A. R. E. N. 'T.

What's your counterargument? Wanna try to argue with me? Because I wouldn't suggest it. I would suggest posting coherently. And I would suggest doing so immediately.

[Zai]

I'd be interested to see if Web is right about SHAD0W.

[Apostolic Nihilist]

Done. I'm never doing one of those again.

I'm going to go take a break or something then read over it, Neruz' scumminess is still fresh in my mind though. I don't suggest anyone else reading this as it's mostly incomprehensible and it's just feelings I got off of almost everyone's posts.

Spoiler: Not suitable for human consumption. (click to show/hide)

01. SirBayer   - 'hey guys did we start yet?' -> claims nuclear rocket surgeon -> unvote 'if I voted already (you didn't), rvote Eduren, 'why aren't you voting?! -DIFFERENT BEHAVIOUR FROM BEGINNER'S MAFIA 3-'

02. Cheeetar   - Dramatic entrance at page 20. 'Oh, dude, this started?' vote Mephansteras, 'meph asking questions is his scum tell.'

03. Neruz   - vote Pandarsenic -> selfvote -> unvote (joke; not interested in actually random-voting?) -> rvote webadict, 'too dangerous to live' -> responds to Mr.Person, responds to CobaltKobold (neither directed anything toward him), jokingly suggests bandwagon on Mr.Person, -> unvote webadict 'lurking or dead', rvote ToonyMan 'alive and dangerous'. -> 'it makes perfect sense, no fun lynching someone who's absent.' -> 'superior attitude means SCUM!', -> unvote. FOS Meph and Webadict. -> "Hey guys, I wasn't being SERIOUS before, you know?" -> 'My finger is being attracted to Mr.Person, he's a bit overaggressive like in Wizard, and he was scum then too' -> vote Eduren. 'He overreacted pretty seriously.' -> 'twas but a bit of sarcasm!' -> 'Let's band together and lynch webadict due to being super dangerous, guys!' (Sarcasm.) -> Votecount is 'Everyone is voting everyone else!' -> 'Also holy shit 24 pages' (I know, right?) -> 'Dakarian's got the most votes so if we want to lynch him let's just bandwagon him. Also Meph is wagging that finger furiously at me, but I'm innocent.' (Verdict: SCUM SCUM SCUM SCUM NERUZ IS SCUM. SERIOUSLY LOOK AT THAT ACTIVE-LURKING.) -> 'I know how to scumhunt! I just can't.'

04. Dakarian   - rvote Mr.Person -> points out Neruz' suspicious activity -> 'Rook, that smells of one of my creations' (related role?), calls out ExKirby on rolefishing -> FOS Eduren for not randomvoting -> rvote Eduren (no unvote?), 'explain yourself or we end RVS right now' -> 'explains the joke. why afraid the spotlight, eduren?', 'passivity noted, Mr.Person' -> 'eduren, you weren't just explaining yourself! you were scared. you sound like you're protecting something' -> 'EDUREN YOU WERE SCARED DAMMIT,' WoT explaining emotions = scum -> 'Last time I made an attack like that, I found scum! You're scum, aren't you?!' -> 'Passiveness, from webadict?!' FOS webadict. -> defends Mr. Person (sort of? Just clarifying things though..) -> 'Weak derail, web. STOP PROTECTING MY QUARRY.' -> "Now, people truly underestimate RVS. ...*WoT*, defends self from web, -> attacks web. -> 'I'm voting for Eduren, he's heavy into self-preservation!' -> 'web, is your attack based on my meta? You go after how you think I should be acting.' -> 'Me, scum? Ah, hah, hah. Rashilul. Explain.' -> DAKARIAN X WEBADICT ARGUMENT. NOTHING HAPPENS. -> WoT. 'Now THAT'S how you scum hunt!' -> Vote Zai. 'Scum.' -> WoT.

05. SHAD0WDump   - rvote Leafsnail -> unvote, no reasoning (leafsnail responded?) -> 'psychotic laugh' -> 'the one ring' -> 'quite' -> 'can't say, easily' -> 'Very few words' -> 'Need other speak.' -> 'Just wait.' -> 'No impediment tomorrow.' -> vote Webadict 'one word explanation!' -> 'Dakarian made sense!' -> Defends Dakarian some more, from web. Seems to really, really not like web.

06. Leafsnail   - rvote ExKirby, 'how will Panda make up for lack of numbers on mafia team?' -> defense of ExKirby, 'could be RFing... might be a mistake' -> 'ExKirby, if you have a power role, you don't want to claim it day 1', 'let's NOT lynch Toonyman just for being in this game', rvote Rashlul, 'lurking' -> FOS Org, 'lurking' -> 'Whoa, lots of pages...' Vote Webadict 'Passivity, weak attacks, weak defense, weak everything.' FOS Mephansteras. 'Useless questions.' FOS Rashilul. 'Vote was on you originally, and you haven't given me any real reason to remove it. I'm unvoting in order to put more pressure on webadict and I'm explaining myself right now to look less scummy!' FOS Zai 'What the hell is up with this post?:' 'Leaving someone to attack you is the definition of passivity!' 'Also, you lurkers are annoying! Let's not lynch the lurkers yet though, let's try someone who's more active.'

07. ExKirby   - rvote SirBayer, roleclaims Rook, RFs a bit. -> unvote SirBayer 'he posted', suggests that 'role names mean little'. -> 'who wants to lynch me?! Wait guys since I have a power role you probably shouldn't!!11' -> 'hey guys what's going on?' -> rvote Apostolic Nihilist 'needs to talk'. -> unvote, vote webadict. 'He's too pushy!'

08. Vector   - Not-so-dramatic entrance at page 21. 'Sorry for the lack of posts, I'll try and formulate some stuff.'

09. Mr.Person   - rvote Zai, 'what do you think of Neruz?' -> unvote, vote dakarian 'you don't say when RVS ends!' -> 'Man guys webadict is acting really really weird you should be careful. speaking of which...' vote Toonyman 'why unvote shadowdump!?' (Huh. So web is suspicious but Toony is moreso?! Also, flimsy argument. Meph said he unvoted because the restriction would be lifted tomorrow.) -> Unvote. 'Your terrible allegations can be dealt with by my attorney scumbuddy Dakarian!, vote Zai. 'You cannot leave empty attacks without expecting me to ask why.' -> 'Nice deflection, Zai. You're scum.' -> 'Zai. You evaded my question.' -> 'Zai, you said either I or web was scum!! I will not forgive this insolence, so please tell us why.' -> 'Zai, you really do look scummy y'know.'

10. Mephansteras   - rvote Vista for 'causing the mod trouble.' -> 'well, it was supposed to be humorous...' -> unvote, rvote Neruz 'Your logic is off...' -> unvote, 'that's not helpful, Shadowdump, ' vote shadowdump. (Doesn't know about post restriction) -> 'might get shadow modkilled if he abuses too much.' unvote. 'annoying, not worth lynching'. vote Neruz. -> Defends self from Mr. Person -> Attacks Neruz 'bounced around your vote a lot earlier.' -> 'So far you've fingered web and I as scum. Why?' -> 'I'm pushing Neruz because he's scummy. ALSO I'm not ignoring other people!! I'm watching them too.' -> Defends self some more.

11. Apostolic Nihilist   -

12. Zai   - rvote Apostolic Nihilist 'talk or die'. [[wait what, unvote AN and vote Neruz]] -> 'no content in Shadowdump's post', 'leafsnail, everyone has a PR', FOS Rashilul 'no content'. -> 'dakarian is strange, meph is off, neruz is bad logic, rashilul & shadow are possibly scum' -> 'Too bad, use multiple posts then' (suggesting Shadow get modkilled?) -> 'pursuasive indeed.' buddies with dakarian -> 'Either web or Mr. Person is scum', unvote Neruz (no reason), vote Mephansteras. 'fo sho scum' -> 'He's off his rocker!', rvote Apostolic Nihilist. -> Assault on Org. 'POST SOMETHING USEFUL OR DIE.' -> Unvote AN. Vote Mephansteras, 'He's asking questions!' (obvious meta I don't get), evades Mr.Person's question. -> 'You asked me a question? Also isn't it funny how everyone is going after someone else? (except the like 4 votes there are on Meph right now) -> 'I didn't mean either, I meant at least one of you is scum. Leaning more heavily on web.' vote webadict.(no unvote?...) -> 'Webadict, please don't be so condescending, your lordship. I don't need to convince anyone so I don't need an explanation.' Suspicions: Web, Meph, Dak.' -> unvote. vote Neruz, 'This is ridiculous!' (I'm glad someone agrees)

13. Eduren   - rvote Mephansteras -> 'I guess that's a joke...', vote remains on Mephansteras -> unvote Mephansteras, -> FOS Dakarian for 'reading comprehension', 'so many people, some slide under the radar,' rvote Cheeetar -> 'whoa, what? I was making a joke' -> 'afraid of the spotlight!? Haha I think not! no but seriously where am I acting like that?' -> 'scared? I wasn't scared! Nor have I been activelurking!!'

14. ToonyMan   - 'why does no one vote me in RVS?', calls CobaltKobold scum for casual talk. -> points out ExKirby's ridiculously scummy post, says it doesn't apply to him. -> 'wait since webadict isn't here I should by lynched?', defends self from Neruz. -> *snorty laugh* (?!) -> 'neruz, you're being insane -- your plan isn't working.' -> FOS SirBayer 'good time being scum?' -> vote Dakarian 'very different this game' (not really, no) -> vote Shadow 'what the hell!?' (He doesn't know there's a post restriction yet) -> 'Looks like Shadow has a post restriction, but hey guys, don't worry, I'm not fishing for it or anything. Sucks for town.' -> unvote 'probably three words, could be a lie' -> agrees with dakarian. 'could be scum trying to get a lynch on someone who always acts scummy.' -> cobaltkobold 'He's a robot!' (typical Toony response) -> 'Eduren doesn't care about defending himself, at least town.' (?) -> 'Classy scumhunting brah!' (referring to Shadow) -> 'DON'T TAZ ME BRO' -> unvote, vote webadict. 'Super scummy brah!'

15. Webadict   - vote Mephansteras 'for always being scum' (some sort of meta tell which I can't see?) -> 'Hmmmmm... oh, well.' unvote, rvote SirBayer 'pretty scummy, I guess' -> 'scummy.' -> 'Avoiding OMGUS? Scummy business, Dakarian.' -> 'AM I NOT REAL ENOUGH FOR YOU, BRO? EH!?' vote Dakarian. 'That's something real, you stupid moron.' -> MEPHANSTERAS RAEG WHY SO SCUMMY?' -> Refutes WoT with three sentences. -> 'Dakarian is making sense but only to make us think that he's town!' -> WoT. 'I'll attack you later, Meph.' -> RAEG RAEG SHADOWDUMP RAEG JUST GET MODKILLED RAEG also Dakarian you're acting like a townie, but it's only acting! -> 'Oh really, Zai? I'm scum? Let's see some GODDAMN REASONING! -> 'Zai, why do you find Dakarian so scummy? Also the other lurkers? Oh and there's not much to go on with Meph, either.' (Complete attitude change?!) -> 'Shadowdump Fiasco? I hardly remember the name! No but serious, tell me.' -> DAKARIAN X WEBADICT ARGUMENT NOTHING HAPPENS -> RAEG AT EXKIRBY RAEG TELL ME WHERE I'M SCUM YOU IDIOTS RAEG RAEG -> EXTREME RAEG AT SHADOWDUMP RAEG RAEG GO KILL YOURSELF RAEG -> RAEG RAEG RAEG I AM NO MAID RAEG LEARN TO READ RAEG RAEG RAEG RAEG VOTE SHADOWDUMP RRRRRRRAAAAAEEEEEEGGGGGGGG

16. Org      - Dramatic entrance on page 19: 'YO GUYS I'M MEGA AWESOME^10000 I WATCHED SOME FIREFLY IT'S PRETTY COOL NOW BYE' -> 'leaf is pretty weird guys' -> vote Neruz. 'Neruz, bandwagoning is bad.' (LOLWUT, Org, you're the fourth person to vote him)

17. CobaltKobold   - rvote Rashilul, 'favorite scumbuddies?' -> 'that post had casual and scumhunting in it' FOS Toonyman, 'why single me out?', FOS Eduren 'activelurkyscummy', vote Rashilul 'he's yet to answer me', 'nice rolefishing SirBayer' -> 'So what? Look around and answer anyways, Rashilul' -> grasps for straws to implicate eduren 'Active lurking!' -> 'a' key dies. -> 'Toony, is that some buddying?' -> FOS Vector & AN. 'They haven't showed up!' Attack Zai for flipping around.

18. Rashilul   - 'being pulled away for a few hours... be back in 2-4 hours'(why? That isn't a long period of time) -> FOS Dakarian. 'haven't acquainted myself with the current situation' -> rvote SirBayer 'Hey SirBayer what's up?' -> 'can't answer because i'm new' -> 'Oh shit, DnD' (!?!) -> 'Dakarian is scummy, SirBayer is lurking.' -> 'Oh, webadict too. Wouldn't want to choose sides or anything.' -> unvote SirBayer, he 'may or may not be scum'. -> 'Going out. Not gonna post for a bit.' unvote, vote Webadict.

19. RedWarrior0      - rvote Dakarian -> 'not RNCing, someone might be after me' -> GEE I SURE HOPE GORDON FREEMAN ATTACKS ME TONIGHT (non sequitur. rolefishing? what?) -> unvote. Vote Neruz. Points out Neruz' scumminess.

[SHAD0Wdump]

ARE YOU SERIOUS?

Don't insult, explain.