Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Tiruin]

He's not entirely removed from the forum DB, that's for sure. I can still click to his profile.


But yeah, that's sad. He's a p cool guy, just takes FG&RP a bit too seriously.

I doubt its that.

[Sirus]

He's not entirely removed from the forum DB, that's for sure. I can still click to his profile.


But yeah, that's sad. He's a p cool guy, just takes FG&RP a bit too seriously.

I doubt its that.

That's basically what he was muted for before: being overly argumentative in the various forum games he was a part of.
What do you think it was?

[Playergamer]

Ugh. Guess we have to move on. Definitely a punch in the gut.

Goodbye, GWG. We'll miss you.

[10ebbor10]

I assume it has been deleted.

But anyway, you don't get banned for doing something. You get banned for doing something against someone. Toady doesn't scan the entire forum, he merely reacts on reports.

[Putnam]

You usually get banned for doing something repeatedly unless it's particularly egregious, such as the standard shock image posters we occasionally get (who don't actually show up in the ban log AFAIK).

[Tiruin]

He's not entirely removed from the forum DB, that's for sure. I can still click to his profile.


But yeah, that's sad. He's a p cool guy, just takes FG&RP a bit too seriously.

I doubt its that.

That's basically what he was muted for before: being overly argumentative in the various forum games he was a part of.
What do you think it was?

I assume it has been deleted.

But anyway, you don't get banned for doing something. You get banned for doing something against someone. Toady doesn't scan the entire forum, he merely reacts on reports.

Err, this one, Sirus.

One can put both emotion, feeling and attachment towards things like these--but if they strike against another person, that's where others have to intervene.

[Furtuka]

Just found the topic. Yep he had a page long insult ridden argument with someone in a forum game. Despite 7 warnings in the past, and his multiple mutings

[Neonivek]

You usually get banned for doing something repeatedly unless it's particularly egregious, such as the standard shock image posters we occasionally get (who don't actually show up in the ban log AFAIK).

They don't but then again they tend not to be really forum goers. So putting them on the banlist is just giving them undue attention.

[Darvi]

Actually they used to show up on the log, but I guess Toady figured that nobody is gonna miss them either way and left them out.

[Dutchling]

So this is pretty cool.

[LordSlowpoke]

rip in peace gwg

in your own way you were the silliest bastard a silly bastard could bastard the silly out of

* LordSlowpoke plays mournful kazoo

[Graknorke]

So this is pretty cool.

So it's like the thing in Ratatouille but with cockroaches?
Also you have to somehow catch one to make it work which sounds like a bit of a setback.

[Playergamer]

Petition to unban GWG is already up. Guardsman, I know he was an ok guy, but I see no reason to unban him. He did what he did, and it is done.

[Imperial Guardsman]

So this is pretty cool.

So it's like the thing in Ratatouille but with cockroaches?
Also you have to somehow catch one to make it work which sounds like a bit of a setback.

Suddenly peta sends in a swat team.

rip in peace gwg

in your own way you were the silliest bastard a silly bastard could bastard the silly out of

* LordSlowpoke plays mournful kazoo

Oh, really? You seemed to agree with Darvi that you didnt like him at all.

[LordSlowpoke]

yeah he was an asshole to people but i never really got the bad end of the stick so i guess i liked him in the end?

but not enough to take several tonnes of manure and shape it into a precedent that allows popular people to fuck the rules they have support

keep this confined to the petition thread thanks