Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Mish]

Zathras: You started off with a random vote, after this you had a pretty good post, you prodded a lurker and asked some questions and didn't really do anything too scummy, really you haven't done the best scumhunting in the thread (probably due to the lurkers) but still low on my scum list, the reason for this is (I think, I'm not the best or most experienced at mafia, so please correct me) you are too preoccupied by data, we can win this game with good ol' fashioned scumhunting, relying on data will just get us picked off day after day.

JanusTwoface: Wanted a policy lynch, went on about that and not much else except for defence, then you just stopped when criptfeind attacked you for it. Then you went on to prod a lurker, great but still just as likely to be scum cleaning his hands. After this you defended yourself somemore, you're attacks seem weak and just gentle jabs to make it look like you're scumhunting. Not so sure about you.

Toaster: Haven't posted much, but everything you have posted has been content, low on the scum list.

Jim Groovester: Scumhunting, nothing much more to say, looking town especially since he hasn't taken the opportunity of not being attacked to sink into the shadows

Org: Wow, very... blunt style of playing the game, people seem to be familiar with it, is that your normal play?

Pandarsenic:  Not enough to get a read on.

Mr.Person: Has only attacked JTF, no good read yet.

webadict: Not enough to get a read on, but if he deserves the fame I hear about then surely he is better than this?

Ottofar: Not enough to get a read on.

SHAD0Wdump: Wow. Not sure what to do yet, I'll have my opinion by the end of the day.

Mysteriousbluepuppet: Not enough to get a read on.

Eduren: Posted once... PREEDIT: seems he has posted since I wrote this

Criptfeind: Attacking, doesn't seem too scummy


I'll write more in a minute.

[Pandarsenic]

So when Zathras goes after lurkers he's fixated on data, but when Janus goes after lurkers he's "scum cleaning his hands"?

Duly noted.

[Mish]

JTF raised my suspicion beforehand, and other peoples, if he was scum he would of needed something to make him look a bit more townish, lurkers would have been a perfect target, if I was scum in that position I would do something similar.

[Pandarsenic]

JTF raised my suspicion beforehand, and other peoples,

Why do you find this important?

[Mish]

Because that would of been how he knew he needed a backup.

[Pandarsenic]

Because that would of been how he knew he needed a backup.

"a backup" or "to back up"?

I assume English isn't your first language?

[Mish]

"a backup" or "to back up"?

Worded it wrong. Maybe this would be better:

Because that would of been how he knew he needed a way to look like a townie.

I assume English isn't your first language?

No, I just fail at anything that isn't maths or science.

[Mish]

Gah, nevermind worded it wrong again, too quick to post.

[Org]

Zathras: You started off with a random vote, after this you had a pretty good post, you prodded a lurker and asked some questions and didn't really do anything too scummy, really you haven't done the best scumhunting in the thread (probably due to the lurkers) but still low on my scum list, the reason for this is (I think, I'm not the best or most experienced at mafia, so please correct me) you are too preoccupied by data, we can win this game with good ol' fashioned scumhunting, relying on data will just get us picked off day after day.

JanusTwoface: Wanted a policy lynch, went on about that and not much else except for defence, then you just stopped when criptfeind attacked you for it. Then you went on to prod a lurker, great but still just as likely to be scum cleaning his hands. After this you defended yourself somemore, you're attacks seem weak and just gentle jabs to make it look like you're scumhunting. Not so sure about you.

Toaster: Haven't posted much, but everything you have posted has been content, low on the scum list.

Jim Groovester: Scumhunting, nothing much more to say, looking town especially since he hasn't taken the opportunity of not being attacked to sink into the shadows

Org: Wow, very... blunt style of playing the game, people seem to be familiar with it, is that your normal play?

Pandarsenic:  Not enough to get a read on.

Mr.Person: Has only attacked JTF, no good read yet.

webadict: Not enough to get a read on, but if he deserves the fame I hear about then surely he is better than this?

Ottofar: Not enough to get a read on.

SHAD0Wdump: Wow. Not sure what to do yet, I'll have my opinion by the end of the day.

Mysteriousbluepuppet: Not enough to get a read on.

Eduren: Posted once... PREEDIT: seems he has posted since I wrote this

Criptfeind: Attacking, doesn't seem too scummy


I'll write more in a minute.

Your description seems very confusing.
You say blunt. How?
And yes, i play like this.

[Mish]

For lack of a better word.

Some examples:
here, here, here, here, here and here

And sorry, I'll have to work a lot on the clarity of my posts.

[Toaster]

[Long post snipped]

This better, Toaster?

Somewhat.  You're still not coming up with much that's original, so I can't shake the feeling that you're largely borrowing arguments from other people.  It *could* just be a factor of the large crowd here, but I'm keeping my eye on you, especially starting next day.


MBP:  You said you'd post last night, and didn't.  Got anything today?

[Mephansteras]

The Whiteboard
JanusTwoface: SHAD0Wdump
KaminaSquirtle: Leafsnail, Org, Ottofar
SHAD0Wdump: Criptfeind, JanusTwoface, Jim Groovester, Pandarsenic, Toaster
Mish: Mysteriousbluepuppet
Toaster: webadict
Zathras: KaminaSquirtle
webadict: Mr.Person, Zathras


Day ends ~5pm Pacific Today

[Jim Groovester]

Does that answer your questions? Probably a bit more verbose reply than necessary, but I seem to be typing up several paragraphs every once in a while in this game anyway.

I suppose that's sufficient. Unvote. A parting question though: Are either Zathras or SHADOW redeemable in your eyes? Or are you totally convinced?

Hell no for SHADOWdump. You can't deliberately act like scum and expect to get away with it.

Zathras, on the other hand, is not in a situation where there's nothing he can do to change my mind. Once he starts, if he ever starts, doing normal town things like scumhunting and stirring up shit instead of tracking lurkers and endlessly prodding them and otherwise avoiding conflict and scrutiny, I'll probably have to change my vote.

[SHAD0Wdump]

Hell no for SHADOWdump. You can't deliberately act like scum and expect to get away with it.

Alright you know what, if people are going to have that sort of attitude, this is not a game I'm going to want to be playing.

I would ask for a replacement, but hell with that, the person wouldn't be in the game for very long because I will be lynched before the night is over.

[Jim Groovester]

Don't give me that crap. You knew what you were doing. When you say shit like this I pretty much have to lynch you.

Protip: Don't do shit like that again.