Lol, wat?
My computer just BSOD'd.
First time ever.
All I was doing was posting a reply to Kamina and listening to some Homestuck muzak.
Is... is this normal? Is Mafia cursed?
Now I have to retype this; goody.
Lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers lurkers.
You say lurking isn't detrimental to scum, then make all of your FoSes/Votes based on lurking.
Don't do a Zathras, please?
On lynching lurkers: I say do it if we have no other leads. Right now we have leads all over the place. We have people to lynch before lurkers. We shouldn't give them a free pass, but I don't think they would be a good lynch right now.
I see no contradictions there. Lurking is good for scum and bad for town, generally, right? So what's wrong with voting/FoSing lurkers? At worst, it gets them prodded, or gets them to participate/replace, and at best, it reveals scum hiding in the shadows.
And yeah, we do have people to lynch before lurkers; but it looks like the town is doing just that. Lynching. I see a massive horn-pile of votes over there for Pandar, and plenty of suspicion elsewhere, but MPH and Mish are getting off relatively easy, and I don't like it.
It's not like voting Pandar is going to hammer him. You seem to be glossing over this entire Zathras Pandarsenic thing. I don't like it. It's still this lurker stuff.
What are your views on Pandar/Zathras? How could Pandar defend himself well enough to convince you of him not being scum?
Well, according to da rulez, the day ends when everyone has voted, right? So wherever I place my vote, it progresses towards Pandar getting hammered. So why should I waste my vote by throwing it on the huge pile of foregone conclusions when I can toss it at some lurkers and try to force them out of their hidey-holes?
I didn't really mention the whole Zathras-Pandarsenic situation because it seems like it's already been gone over with a microscope, tweezers and a steady hand. Zathras can potentially prove his role, Pandar has yet to prove anything or contribute. They both seem kind of scummy, one of them is getting lynched today. How shall I add to that? Other than my n00bish opinion, all the facts seem to be out on the table.
How can Pandar defend himself well enough to convince me that he isn't scum? If I knew the answer to that, I'd be a natural Mafia expert
But he seems guilty of the same thing that I suspect MBP and Mish of: Lurking and not contributing. The only difference here is that the
entire town is going after Pandar at this point.
I'll just attack the lurkers I can see who are getting by without too much fuss, in the meantime.
Oh, uh, noticing the whiteboard I thought I definitely voted for MBP in my post, but...
vote MPB