And I'll interject on the behalf of a virtually confirmed townie whenever I like, thank you.
Virtually confirmed Psychic Warden? Yes. Virtually confirmed townie? No. (I will give you likely townie though, it depends on the rest of the scum team. I can see a Pandarsenic bus happening with 1 or 2 possible teams).
Does this really seem like something a townie would do? Make up his mind early on Day 1, and then never change his mind, or even his focus?
If he's found scum? Yes.
Have you considered the possibility that you're wrong? (Seriously, I can't tell if you have or haven't). Because if you do manage to lynch me, it's going to look *really* problematic for you tomorrow.
It could, but no.
Also, explanation could be posting exhausted, just to check in at the day end.
And the lack of chains. And me not thinking about Pandar until then.
This ... is all you have? A *lot* has happened that you are completely continuing to ignore for two game days now. In the future, please don't sign up if you aren't going to play.
As my note to Kamina made embarrassingly clear, the non-physicality of the thing was not immediately obvious to me until I reread my role PM in preparation of sending the night action. This is my first paranormal, so it being a remote action was not clear on my mind. Yes, I was worried you were setting me up to be killed by sentry guns or somesuch, but this was a baseless worry.
This I'll give you. There are a lot of little details that it's easy enough to miss in the ruleset. Now you know.
They should both be hanged, but for different reasons. Web is the scummiest, so I'm voting him as that's how one plays the game -- lynch the scummiest. MBP hanging, on the other hand, is more of a meta-game argument: his absence hurts the game, and his replacement would give a scummy player an unwarranted clean slate; the game would proceed better if he hangs. He is certainly scummy enough to deserve to hang. But I only have one vote, so I'm telling people that if we wish to pursue a meta-gaming lynch for the benefit of all players, I'll support it. It's better than having two inactive players murking the waters; it interferes with all our abilities to successfully scumhunt or narrow possibilities down. The game would be better with him gone, so if I can help make it so, I will.
Read what you wrote here (especially the
green parts) and remember the main reason you think I'm scummy...
It is, isn't it? Offtopic question: why did you never submit Sorcerer's I results to the new attendance tracking thread?
There's a new attendance board? Huh. I'll look into that.
Diving back through the thread history was very refreshing. How in the bloody hell did you get off this easily so far? You kill Org, for a stupid reason. ... This is not a defense. Attacking you for killing Org is perfectly legitimate, as that is a MAJOR, SERIOUS EVENT THAT HAPPENED.
Oh good. I point out that you're being active-lurky. You know this is scummy, so you fix your behaviour. But then you come out swinging at me.
Not at all what I was hoping for, but it's a good start.
Points (Jim's made most of these already):
- It would be scummier to hold back my night kill until LYLO, although waiting until Day 2 or 3 would have been reasonable.
- I don't have a Mind Shield. It would have been random chance if I had.
- I thought there was a reasonable chance Org was scum.
- He's risky because he's difficult to lynch.
- If I were scum, I wouldn't have killed Org. (Yes, this is WIFOM. It's also true)
Yes, they brought it up with him, and I found his defense to be... well, nothing at all, actually. Deflection, if anything. My problem is that everyone just seems to have gone "Oh, you mean we can't attack you for killing town? ok then" and walked away.
I agree with you that I haven't provided a terribly strong defense. But I disagree that this is a bad thing. It isn't a terribly strong point to attack (from any of the previous times or from you), thus it doesn't merit a terribly strong defense.
Hey, guys. The combination of Thanksgiving and no internet has led me to not posting. I have looked over the thread, and I'll post later today with something more, but I have one question for Zathras:
Understandable, but do you plan on making it back by the end of the day? It's today in case you haven't noticed. If not but you do plan on contributing, request an extension. (I'd rather you posted today though)
I'm not sure I understand. It's better to randomly kill someone and have something like a 70+% chance of hitting town than it is to be patient and use it when the likelihood of nailing some scum is much higher? Why is that? It just seems to me that I would want to avoid taking out a townsperson, even if it means I get lynched before I used the bot. Two townies dying < one townie dying < one townie dying and one dopp dying < a dopp dying.
If it were completely random, that would be a bad thing. If I thought it was completely random, I wouldn't have done it. Your order of how good things are is great and all, but completely misses the point. There are far more town than scum, so we can take risks at the begining. It's towards LYLO that risks get far more dangerous.
1. Org suspected him.
2. Even he admitted Org was being much less 'orglike' than usual.
1. I can't guarantee this, but I'm guessing that Org suspected me because I was attacking him. That's classic behaviour in anyone, more so in Org.
2. I think I responded to this point already. He did get better for a bit when I prodded him for it (which you've just done as well), but then he slid back by the end of the day.
i'm there, reading p page 42 now. Will be there shrotly
Same thing as webadict earlier. Welcome back, understandable that you posted less over the Holiday. But you had better post something by the end of the day or request an extension.
Extend until we're actually lynching scum (preferably Janus, since he's already got two votes).
As much as I disagree with you in general, I can agree with (the first part of) this.
Extend.
The second part bothers me though. You seem to want to lynch me no matter what and you're using the fact that I have two votes on me to back that up? By that same logic, we should lynch you, yes?
I still think lynching Ottofar is the best corse of action, particularly given the three choices we have now. But we really need the
four people who haven't voted (webadict, Ottofar, Mysteriourbluepuppet, and Mish) to vote. It's unlikely to get a vote from Mish, but webadict and Mysteriousbluepuppet have at least promised to do so (ish).