Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Org]

Did you just claim scum.

No. I think you're town, however Org you might be. And you technically claimed cop.

No.

You say you think I'm town, I want to see why you think I'm town, scum can fake-claim.

[Ottofar]

Because I trust you. In the end, reading you comes from the gut feeling.

[Org]

You shouldn't believe someone is town because of your gut, go hang on a rope.

[Zathras]

Hm. Stagnating again.

Toaster, your nuking is a day action, yes? If so, you should do it now. If we let you wait until the end of the day, you'll have no incentive to go through with it. Therefore, I vote Toaster until he carries it out. If you are still looking for suggestions on whom, I'd say Pandar, as I still think he's scummy, and his kittens make him pretty much lynch immune.

I also suggest all of you who also think Toaster should nuke someone today, vote him now or he'll chicken out of it. You can return to your voting targets after that.

Once Toster carries out what he said he'd do, I'll go back to voting Argembarger, as I still think he's the best one to lynch as he's both potential scum and potential cultist.

[Org]

But if Pandar is town, your getting rid of our power power role.

[IronyOwl]

Once Toster carries out what he said he'd do, I'll go back to voting Argembarger, as I still think he's the best one to lynch as he's both potential scum and potential cultist.

Now wait just a goddamned minute. Zathras, what makes you think there's a revivocult out there, hmmmm?

[Pandarsenic]

Why would Ottofar even say that? :I

[Zathras]

But if wishes were horses we'd all be eating steak.

I don't believe Pandar to be town. In fact, I believe him to be a particularly powerful role for scum. In any case, it's not like he's been useful at all, and Nirur is likely to keep blocking him as long as he's got powers, so we're wasting at least one town power role anyway. No, we're better off without his kittens.

I just want Toaster to either nuke someone or hang. It doesn't have to be Pandar, that's just my top choice. Org, if you agree that Toaster must nuke someone, please vote him before he gets away with his utterly scummy day 2 with no consequences.


PPE: Irony: I don't, but he's on both lists as prepared by those who think there may be, so it's statistically a better choice to lynch. Plus the meta-argument of saving us a replacement.

[Org]

But if wishes were horses we'd all be eating steak.

I don't believe Pandar to be town. In fact, I believe him to be a particularly powerful role for scum. In any case, it's not like he's been useful at all, and Nirur is likely to keep blocking him as long as he's got powers, so we're wasting at least one town power role anyway. No, we're better off without his kittens.

I just want Toaster to either nuke someone or hang. It doesn't have to be Pandar, that's just my top choice. Org, if you agree that Toaster must nuke someone, please vote him before he gets away with his utterly scummy day 2 with no consequences.


PPE: Irony: I don't, but he's on both lists as prepared by those who think there may be, so it's statistically a better choice to lynch. Plus the meta-argument of saving us a replacement.

I think Toaster should nuke you.

[Org]

Oh yeah.
Claim time.
I am Viktor Reznov.
Two powers.
Where's Reznov? I am night kill immune, but my vote doesn't count. Because I am a hallucination/brainwashing thing.
Soldier's Instinct. Its a little detective action thing.

[Zathras]

As a reminder: Toaster did defend intensely (directly and indirectly) Jokerman D1 and D2, he did fail to express an opinion on him until strongly pressed, he did then dismiss all and went with his "gut feel" of town (he did call him town, and opposed his lynch until the end), and continued to support his previously scummy acts. Toaster is scum and the prime candidate as Joker's scumbuddy; the only reason people let him off the hook was because of his offer to nuke someone today. But if we don't threaten to lynch him, he won't do it: the scummiest guy lives another day, and the question remains unresolved. We should not allow this.

Once he goes through with it, we can safely return our votes to whomever we individually think is a better target for the lynch.


PPE: Org, your role sounds like a scum role.

[IronyOwl]

Interesting claim, Org. Makes me want to nuke you a lot less.

However, we still need a target. I guess I'm leaning more towards Pandar, despite not believing his claim to begin with and wanting to see his roleflip.


Zathras, I don't think Toaster would be that bold in trying to wriggle out of it, but yes, if he doesn't blow up I'm in full favor of lynching him instead.

[Zathras]

Zathras, I don't think Toaster would be that bold in trying to wriggle out of it, but yes, if he doesn't blow up I'm in full favor of lynching him instead.

You need to use some red text there, or it's just empty words. "In favour of lynching him" has never lynched anyone.

[IronyOwl]

Zathras, I don't think Toaster would be that bold in trying to wriggle out of it, but yes, if he doesn't blow up I'm in full favor of lynching him instead.

You need to use some red text there, or it's just empty words. "In favour of lynching him" has never lynched anyone.

I didn't realize we were just a couple hours from the end of the day, and in light of our indecision didn't think Toaster was really stalling. But yes, I suppose you're right.

Toaster, the time is now. I support nuking Pandarsenic.

[Nirur Torir]

Toaster, nuke time. I also support nuking Pandarsenic.