Let it not be forgotten that, in order to foment my lurker-lynch, you dropped a lurker-lynch on Pandarsenic (despite agreeing that his scum-meta involved activelurking), and even went out of your way to DEFEND Pandar's lurking as "Town behavior".
I never said that. I said it was usual for town Pandarsenic to lurk like a piece of shit, which is completely true. I never said it was "Town behavior" at all.
The point of what I said was that for Pandarsenic in particular, lurking like a piece of shit isn't necessarily a strong indication of his alignment one way or the other.
Lordnincompoop pointed out the same. I don't see you questioning him about it though.
After that, you swapped to lead a vote on a different lurker, parroting the same two arguments repeatedly for the REST OF THE DAY (namely, "He Agreed with Max White," and "He's Lurking"). Never once did you revise your stance as the day changed, nor respond to any shifting factors.
Would you like to explain how I'm supposed to change my argument against somebody who lurks for five days straight?
I asked you questions. You never responded to them. I did what I was supposed to, while you didn't.
You even went so far as to attack players voting for Kilikan, claiming they were "trying to save me",
According to what I saw, lordnincompoop tied the vote, saving you from the lynch, and according to his word while he was writing his post, he was putting kilakan at a vote ahead. This was a few hours before the deadline. Last minute votes to rescue certain people, or put others ahead, are excellent things to ask people questions about.
while simultaneously avoiding answering questions about why Kilikan and you had identical arguments.
You should be asking kilakan why his arguments were identical to mine. I put forth my thoughts first.
Also, that wasn't a question directed at me. That was a barb by lordnincompoop directed at kilakan, which I used as a springboard to ask him his opinion on my arguments.
I can't be avoiding questions about why kilakan's arguments were identical to mine if nobody asked me those questions in the first place.
Where do you get off condemning one lurker, while pardoning another in the same damned post? Where the hell do you find so much conviction for such a weak lurkervote? How can you accuse someone who cherry-picks someone else's argument as Scum, while chainsaw-defending, attacking the attackers of, and arguing in protection of Kilikan, who did the same damned thing to your arguments?
I never pardoned Pandarsenic for his lurking. You're putting words into my mouth.
If you want the key difference between, say, kilakan and CrownOfFire, kilakan had aggression. Despite that a lot of his reasoning was familiar to everybody else's he wasn't slacking off about it. He asked people
tons of questions about things that he didn't necessarily originally bring up. CrownOfFire didn't do jack shit with the suspicions he borrowed from, most notably, you.
Also, I am a conviction machine. I am so powerful I generate conviction in others. That's where I get the conviction to vote your ass into oblivion for criminal lurking. It's an easy conviction to have, I will admit.
You're double-standard-having scum, Jim Groovester. You just want people killed, and you don't want to look bad doing it. Your efforts to protect your wayward scumbuddy Kilikan are more than obvious, and with your weak arguments based on these petty little opinions, I have a hard time believing that you have any real suspicions at all.
Wanting people killed isn't a scum tell. Similarly, pressing people about their suspicions while pushing your own (which is what you're accusing me of doing in regards to kilakan) isn't a scum tell.
Let's have this conversation again when you tell me I was wrong to suspect you when you lurked for five days straight when you were clearly available to play.
Oh, I can't wait to see how much bile, piss, and vinegar you spew out when in the spotlight. There is a little part of me that will heartily enjoy this.
None. ^_^
Author
Topic: Supernatural Mafia 4 - Game Over! Demonic Victory (Read 281037 times)